← Search

Dale Clark

Severna Park, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 104W–113L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dale Clark to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history217 matches
W
2026-08-09 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Jacobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Laabs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Walko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-23 · Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Rossmark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-22 · Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Walko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Jacobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-16 · Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Petre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-12 · Slice Girls Divas 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrienne Dilaimy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-08 · Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Orso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Jacobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Jacobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 41.5% of games
3.0
40.5%
15W–22L · 47% of games
3.5
62%
31W–19L · 54.7% of games
4.0
30.8%
8W–18L · 43% of games
5.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 63.1% of games
6.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 57.5% of games
6.5
50%
7W–7L · 51.9% of games
7.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 54.2% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.5% of games
8.0
10%
2W–18L · 37.4% of games
2.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
57 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer