← Search

Jill Whitall

Annapolis, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 9W–10L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jill Whitall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2026-06-17 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Mehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-2
L
2026-06-11 · Dare Doubles · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Steel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-05 · Dare Doubles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cara Fulton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-22 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Olaughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-19 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Seamancrawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-06 · Dare Doubles · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with JoAnn Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-24 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Olaughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-21 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cara Fulton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-06-06 · Dare Doubles 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Mishev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
Terri Mrozinski / Nina Davis
2025-05-15 · Dare Doubles 2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Seamancrawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-05-02 · Dare Doubles 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Olaughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-13 · Dare Doubles 2 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Mehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.3% of games
8.0
25%
3W–9L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal