← Search

Debra Stonehouse

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 55W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debra Stonehouse to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2026-09-14 · JOgle.40C-CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Ogle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-31 · JOgle.40C-CCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Sickel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-13 · LRiedel-CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Sickel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
Beth Johnson / Susana Harvey
2026-08-06 · LRiedel-CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-03 · JOgle.40C-CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Priscilla Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-14 · JSykes-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary T Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-09 · JOgle-CCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alise McNeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-07 · JSykes-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alise McNeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-04-01 · JSykes-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alise McNeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Christina Deprez / Carol Davis
2026-03-31 · JSykes-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alise McNeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · JOgle-CCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gay Engelbrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-10 · JSykes-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
61.5%
40W–25L · 57.2% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
44.8%
13W–16L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams