← Search

Nancy Sickel

Durham, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 63W–75L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nancy Sickel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
W
2026-09-08 · EHoover.40C-CCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Elder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-31 · JOgle.40C-CCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Debra Stonehouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-25 · EHoover.40C-CCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Montague
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · LRiedel-CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Debra Stonehouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · JOgle.40C-CCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Sykes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
Melissa Phillips / Frances Wilson
2026-07-29 · MLong.55T-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Holtaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-07-19 · MLong-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-01 · MLong.55T-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvonne Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Melissa Phillips / Monica Jenkins
2026-06-12 · MLong.55T-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-31 · MLong-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Chin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-24 · MLong55-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary T Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-16 · JOgle-CCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
68.9%
31W–14L · 58.5% of games
3.5
25%
6W–18L · 43% of games
6.5
40%
16W–24L · 49.2% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.9% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams