← Search

Amy Strong

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 78W–41L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amy Strong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-09-14 · TOC.Arne · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vicky Arne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-31 · HBlankenship-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracy Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-25 · SBrock.7.5C-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Birkemo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-24 · HBlankenship-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Kleeberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-21 · VArne-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vicky Arne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-18 · SBrock.7.5C-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Birkemo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-17 · TOC.Arne · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vicky Arne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · HBlankenship-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Kleeberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · SBrock.7.5C-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gwendolyn Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · TOC.Arne · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vicky Arne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · GGlish-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David VanHook mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-16 · GGlish-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David VanHook mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
64.1%
25W–14L · 56.5% of games
4.0
40%
6W–9L · 38.5% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.3% of games
7.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 58.1% of games
3.5mixed
84.2%
16W–3L · 61.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
32 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe