← Search

Morgan Hinkley

— year-end
106 matches · 64W–42L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Morgan Hinkley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Burnstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-28 · Conyers/Vogel/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Burnstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-26 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Burnstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Burnstein/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Ouellette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-07 · Conyers/Vogel/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Margaret Behncke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · Burnstein/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-13 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · Burnstein/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lacey Keally
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-19 · Burnstein/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-17 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Teams46 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
91.3%
21W–2L · 69.2% of games
3.5
65.8%
25W–13L · 55.4% of games
4.0
20.8%
5W–19L · 42.1% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 63.8% of games
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 67% of games
7.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe