← Search

Kristofer Merck

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
275 matches · 134W–141L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kristofer Merck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history275 matches
W
2026-08-23 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeffrey Hungarter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-15 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeffrey Hungarter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Ganong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Layton Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-23 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Boyce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-22 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Boyce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · LBuyaki-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Koltchagova mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kay Kajiwara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-14 · LBuyaki-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Koltchagova mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Layton Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victor Talbird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Diane Patton / William Adams
2026-06-14 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Boyce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
50.8%
60W–58L · 50.4% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
39.6%
21W–32L · 45.6% of games
8.5
40%
4W–6L · 49% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.5% of games
8.0mixed
49.2%
32W–33L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
122 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
88 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
50 matches
#3 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal