← Search

Jennifer Kjellerup

Tallahassee, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
249 matches · 143W–106L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Kjellerup to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history249 matches
L
2026-07-02 · Herring · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Herring · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Tullos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
Anna Jones / Catherine Reid
2026-06-24 · Herring · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-21 · Herring · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Tullos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · Thomasville/Thriffiley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · Thomasville/Thriffiley · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catharine Grigsby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · Thomasville/Thriffiley · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-12 · Herring · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Anna Jones / Lisa Graganella
2026-03-06 · Herring · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elaine Rudd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-19 · Herring · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fang Liang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-02-12 · Herring · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Thriffiley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-22 · Herring · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
51.2%
43W–41L · 52.1% of games
7.5
73.8%
31W–11L · 58.3% of games
8.5
95.5%
21W–1L · 66.3% of games
7.0mixed
7.7%
2W–24L · 31.4% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
32W–8L · 61.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
74 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Mixed Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer