← Search

Karen ODonnell

— year-end
122 matches · 52W–70L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Karen ODonnell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Woodlake Cooksey · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorota Kawka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-09 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorota Kawka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-27 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Cabral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-26 · Woodlake Cooksey · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorota Kawka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Cabral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Kratzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-16 · Woodlake Cabral Combo 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · Woodlake Cooksey · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Cooksey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Cabral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Cabral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-02 · Woodlake Cabral Combo 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Hannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Key
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
53.2%
33W–29L · 49.6% of games
4.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 34.4% of games
6.5
0%
0W–5L · 32.6% of games
7.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 50.4% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.3% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
4W–12L · 40.8% of games
7.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert