← Search

Jean Taaffe

— year-end
45 matches · 18W–27L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Jean Taaffe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2024-05-06 · CSU GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Barstow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Ann Smerud / Mary Wilson
2023-08-03 · CSU GOLD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Schaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2023-07-13 · CSU GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Schaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-29 · CSU GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Schaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Bethany Seely / Nancy Olsen
2023-06-26 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Chancellor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
N/A
2023-06-25 · Colorado · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mel Fernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-06-24 · Colorado · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-24 · Colorado · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Muhlbradt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-06-15 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-05-23 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2023-05-08 · CSU WHITE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dee Woodcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2022-07-11 · CSU GOLD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with D'Ann Rhoda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams12 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
41.7%
15W–21L · 48.9% of games
8.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer