← Search

Monica Shea-Henderson

— year-end
44 matches · 14W–30L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Monica Shea-Henderson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-09-04 · St.Rabby40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-5
W
Susan Cook / Elisebeth Gelardi
2026-08-28 · St.Rabby40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · St.Rabby40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Sauls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-3
L
2026-03-06 · St.Rabby55A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Beth Beam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-5
L
2025-10-14 · An.Pfeiffer55C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Beth Beam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-26 · St.Rabby40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dana Weiland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-09-08 · An.Pfeiffer55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiffany Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-08-22 · St.Rabby40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiffany Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-20 · St.Rabby40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiffany Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-08-18 · An.Pfeiffer55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeanmarie Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-04-18 · St.Rabby55A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Tsibulsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
Jean Harrold / Sharon Foster
2025-04-10 · St.Rabby55A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Tsibulsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
13.3%
2W–13L · 39.5% of games
7.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 45.4% of games
4.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.4% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert