← Search

Jeron Russell

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
234 matches · 144W–90L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jeron Russell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history234 matches
W
2026-09-08 · TOC.Sue-Ho · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rawle Sue-Ho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-29 · JLundberg-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jackson Cabell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-23 · TOC.Sue-Ho · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew Hanauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · JLundberg-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jackson Cabell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-08 · JLundberg-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Luc Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · HRoss-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelsey Kowalski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · Le.Ji18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelsey Kowalski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
N/A
2026-07-20 · Le.Ji18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Teasdale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-18 · Jo.Ganeles18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-18 · TOC.Rosemeyer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelsey Kowalski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · HRoss-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · Jo.Ganeles18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Ganeles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
69.4%
68W–30L · 58.4% of games
4.5
34.7%
17W–32L · 44.5% of games
7.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 56.3% of games
8.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 59.2% of games
9.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 70.2% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
63 matches
#2 Singles
15%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
24 matches
#3 Singles
9%
20 matches
#1 Singles
8%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams