← Search

Graham Schillmoller

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
244 matches · 170W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Graham Schillmoller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history244 matches
L
Joseph Smith / Cameron Burch
2026-09-02 · Wi.Mooney40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Russell Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · La.Brock18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Patrick Newsome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-20 · Sc.Troutman40C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lawrence Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-19 · Wi.Mooney40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Russell Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-17 · ANarula.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-13 · Sc.Troutman40C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anthony Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · Wi.Mooney40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with William Mooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
William Adams / Brian Baron
2026-08-01 · TOC.Morrow · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lawrence Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · La.Brock18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawrence Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · La.Brock40S · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · La.Brock18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawrence Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-24 · La.Brock40S · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
72.2%
96W–37L · 59.3% of games
7.5
77.8%
28W–8L · 61.2% of games
8.5
75%
27W–9L · 59.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
53 matches
#2 Singles
7%
18 matches
#3 Singles
7%
17 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams