← Search

Kelsey Kowalski

Garner, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 78W–65L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kelsey Kowalski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
L
2026-08-31 · MPaul.8.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Paul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-30 · Ma.Paul18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leah Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · ACP.Paul · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Paul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-24 · MPaul.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Paul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-10 · MPaul.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Paul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · Ma.Paul18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Paul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · ACP.Paul · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Paul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-30 · HRoss-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeron Russell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · Le.Ji18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeron Russell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-21 · Le.Ji18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Ganeles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-18 · TOC.Rosemeyer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeron Russell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · HRoss-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Scherr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
55.3%
26W–21L · 54.5% of games
4.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 53.4% of games
7.5
30%
3W–7L · 45.1% of games
8.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 36.9% of games
4.0mixed
75%
18W–6L · 62% of games
4.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 60.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
19 matches
#1 Singles
8%
12 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert