← Search

Mary Menlove

— year-end
36 matches · 18W–18L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Mary Menlove to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
N/A
2024-10-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Beames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-09-05 · RISE AC-Glines/Mower · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenni Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-08-22 · RISE AC-Glines/Mower · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Cahoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-08 · RISE AC-Glines/Mower · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-11 · RISE AC-Glines/Mower · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-08 · RISE AC-Mower · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Mower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-5
W
2023-12-14 · RISE AC-Glines · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Mower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-3
L
2023-11-30 · RISE AC-Glines · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Geldmacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2020-09-17 · Eagleridge-Olsen · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kacee Preston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2020-09-03 · Eagleridge-Olsen · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kacee Preston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2020-08-27 · Eagleridge-Olsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosemary Glines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2020-08-20 · Eagleridge-Olsen · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosemary Glines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Teams10 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 66.5% of games
4.0
36%
9W–16L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
3 matches
#3 Female Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova