← Search

Jennifer Koken

CRANBERRY TOWNSHIP, PA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 47W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Koken to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-08-04 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Dinucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-28 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Dinucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Dinucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-2
L
2026-05-19 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Dinucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Katherine Kovalan / Melanie Matter
2024-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Dinucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-1
W
Fran Steger / Andrea Paper
2024-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Dinucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Dinucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Trevenen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Dinucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-02-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Haley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 6-1
L
Michael Kruppa / Kelly Miller
2024-01-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Capo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
55.3%
21W–17L · 50.2% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 50.4% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
18W–18L · 50.8% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert