← Search

Jon Nielson

South Jordan, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 96W–53L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jon Nielson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-07-16 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Hubert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-15 · Eccles OG · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Crandall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
Kerry Perez / Craig Smith
2026-07-11 · Eccles OG · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dario Pinet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · Eccles OG · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Crandall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-01 · Eccles OG · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Crandall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-07 · Sports Mall-Granger · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Hubert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
N/A
2025-10-25 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Hubert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-10-18 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-09-20 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Hubert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-08-23 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Hubert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with TROY GRANGER championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
72.3%
60W–23L · 57.3% of games
4.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 52.4% of games
7.0
60%
9W–6L · 54.1% of games
8.0
25%
2W–6L · 45.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
38 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Male Doubles
3%
5 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal