← Search

Linda Richman

— year-end
116 matches · 65W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Richman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
W
2026-08-10 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacey Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · Indy A40 4.0W CRC Hobbs · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Leary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colleen ONeal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W CRC Hobbs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connie Glass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacia Gudgel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-17 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colleen ONeal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-11 · Indy A40 4.0W CRC Hobbs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Moschel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-03 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-27 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacia Gudgel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-5
W
2026-05-17 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristi Moschel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
80%
20W–5L · 68.4% of games
4.5
44.8%
26W–32L · 47.9% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.1% of games
8.0
70%
7W–3L · 62.9% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.1% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
14 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe