← Search

Amy Schmidt

Indianapolis, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
194 matches · 138W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Schmidt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history194 matches
W
2026-09-09 · High Tri W IHP Hullett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margot Burke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
Catherine Miller / Joline Schmitt
2026-09-02 · High Tri W IHP Hullett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Thompson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · High Tri W IHP Hullett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Thompson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
Jennifer Kowalski / Catherine Miller
2026-08-12 · High Tri W IHP Hullett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Thompson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Claire Reifeis / Mark Phillips
2026-08-07 · Indy X18 9.0 CRC Weitzer · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Landon Shell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lynn Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-20 · Indy A18 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
Wei Wang / Meaghan Chien
2026-07-13 · Indy A18 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sofia Fernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-01 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connie Glass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-4
W
Mimi Murphy / Sunny Taylor
2026-06-22 · Indy A18 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathryn Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-19 · Indy X18 9.0 CRC Weitzer · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrew Weitzer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Richman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 64.9% of games
4.0
91.3%
21W–2L · 70.8% of games
4.5
60%
42W–28L · 54.4% of games
7.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 71.3% of games
8.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 59.7% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 61.8% of games
8.5mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 47.8% of games
9.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
54 matches
#1 Singles
15%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
24 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert