← Search

Ben Atlee

Centennial, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 129W–73L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ben Atlee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history202 matches
W
2026-08-20 · CACM YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Justus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · CACM YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chad Picard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Fritz Allhoff / Nelson Miller
2025-09-06 · #2 Doubles · with Bradford Winslow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-09-04 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sameer Mehta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-24 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with NATALIE KOONTZ mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-3
L
2025-08-21 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sameer Mehta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-18 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with NATALIE KOONTZ mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-08-17 · #3 Doubles · with Bradford Winslow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-08-10 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with NATALIE KOONTZ mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-07 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bradford Winslow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-08-03 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with NATALIE KOONTZ mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-07-31 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chad Picard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
68.3%
69W–32L · 56.1% of games
8.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 54.1% of games
8.5mixed
64.3%
18W–10L · 54.8% of games
9.0mixed
60%
30W–20L · 53.3% of games
9.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
34 matches
#1 Singles
6%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer