← Search

Deborah Severino

Cazenovia, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 23W–37L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Deborah Severino to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-04-12 · Radoff · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonia Dibiase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-15 · Radoff · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Pudusseri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-03 · #4 Doubles · with Juliet Concilla championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
Michelle Smith / Josie Stephenson
2025-08-02 · #4 Doubles · with Juliet Concilla championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-07-31 · Yablonski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Ciarpelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-29 · Radoff · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kris Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-07-22 · Radoff · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kris Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-17 · Yablonski · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Cifonelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-16 · BING: Slammer sisters · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliet Concilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-14 · SYR: Ace Ace Baby · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Juliet Concilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2025-07-09 · BING: Slammer sisters · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliet Concilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-07-07 · SYR: Ace Ace Baby · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Juliet Concilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 48.6% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.6% of games
7.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.5% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal