← Search

Matthew Aptekar

— year-end
24 matches · 20W–4L · seasons 2020–2023

Captains: add Matthew Aptekar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
W
2023-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Howard Genderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-06-12 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2023-03-26 · Racket Attack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2023-03-19 · Racket Attack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2023-03-05 · Racket Attack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-02-26 · Racket Attack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-01-22 · Racket Attack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Levitch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2022-06-23 · Centercourt Chatham 18+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christian Germa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2022-06-16 · Centercourt Chatham 18+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-06-02 · Centercourt Chatham 18+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2022-01-22 · Orange Lawn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Warrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-01-09 · Orange Lawn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Teams8 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 64.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
8 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams