← Search

Emily Klempka

Farmington, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 25W–21L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Klempka to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-08-14 · Monroe: Aquino/Fisher · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with LISA AQUINO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · Monroe: Aquino · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with LISA AQUINO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-18 · Monroe: Aquino/Fisher · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with LISA AQUINO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · Monroe: Aquino/Fisher · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Jamie Feingold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · Team Saffran · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Tan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · Team Saffran · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Saffran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
Jamie Cesere / Candice Leonard
2026-06-26 · Monroe: Aquino/Fisher · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with LISA AQUINO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · Monroe: Aquino/Fisher · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with LISA AQUINO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-22 · Sweet Spots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mari Fitzsimmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aarne Lees mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-04 · #2 Doubles · with Beth McDermott championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-01-04 · #2 Doubles · with Tanya Zutshi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 41% of games
4.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 52.9% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#1 Female Doubles
24%
11 matches
#2 Singles
17%
8 matches
#1 Singles
13%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe