← Search

Robin Sturzebecher

Cary, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 64W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Robin Sturzebecher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-09-04 · El.Copeland55C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ann Bentley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-24 · TOC.Sturzebecher · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-21 · El.Copeland55C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Roni Bonello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · El.Copeland55C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Bricker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · TOC.Sturzebecher · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marianne Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Chunyan Xie / Angie Powell
2026-08-03 · TOC.Sturzebecher · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-22 · ACP.Watson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marianne Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-26 · NMAC.Copeland · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dori Mathews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-12 · NMAC.Copeland · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dori Mathews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-11 · ACP.Watson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marianne Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-05 · NMAC.Copeland · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Lacross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-04 · ACP.Watson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jette Efsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
38.2%
13W–21L · 49.6% of games
8.5
53.2%
33W–29L · 52.8% of games
9.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams