← Search

Jette Efsen

Apex, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
282 matches · 184W–98L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jette Efsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history282 matches
W
2026-09-09 · ACP.Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christine Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-08 · ACP.Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Weygandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-01 · ACP.Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathy Endres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-27 · ACP.Fish · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christine Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Mollie Williams / Emily Johnson
2026-08-24 · TOC.Sturzebecher · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heidi Moreno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-20 · ACP.Fish · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heidi Moreno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-19 · TOC.Sturzebecher · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Susan Marie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-13 · ACP.Fish · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cheryl Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-10 · TOC.Sturzebecher · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Weygandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · NMAC.Efsen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Copeland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · NMAC.Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madelie Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-07-16 · NMAC.Efsen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Geraldine Klauber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 64.3% of games
4.0
68.8%
66W–30L · 58.6% of games
4.5
61.8%
21W–13L · 54.9% of games
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.4% of games
7.5
74.4%
29W–10L · 60.5% of games
8.5
55.6%
20W–16L · 53.9% of games
9.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 56.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
147 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
46 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal