← Search

Joanne Foster

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
195 matches · 115W–80L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Joanne Foster to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history195 matches
L
2026-08-11 · PW.Fitzpatrick · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Ledlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-10 · PW.Santrock · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathy Channell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · with Shayna Bolton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-29 · PW.Fekete · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Sams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-24 · PW.Fekete · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Fekete
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Sandy Alex / Emily Jones
2026-07-16 · PW.Cooper · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Takalo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-08 · PW.Fekete · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · PW.Cooper · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michaela Brannock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · PW.Cooper · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michaela Brannock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · PW.Cooper · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michaela Brannock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-05 · PW.Fekete · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Renee Stegman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-23 · PW.Fekete · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 49.4% of games
3.5
78.6%
22W–6L · 58.9% of games
4.0
61.3%
38W–24L · 54.4% of games
4.5
28%
7W–18L · 39.4% of games
6.5
90%
9W–1L · 63.7% of games
7.5
55.9%
19W–15L · 50.8% of games
8.5
50%
10W–10L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
42 matches
#1 Singles
15%
29 matches
#2 Singles
6%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert