← Search

Marianne Jensen

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
271 matches · 120W–151L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marianne Jensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history271 matches
W
2026-09-04 · El.Copeland55C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Virginia Dirschl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Tanya Smith / Madelie Brand
2026-09-03 · ACP.Fish · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jill Darnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-28 · El.Copeland55C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-14 · El.Copeland55C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Virginia Dirschl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-13 · ACP.Fish · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-10 · TOC.Sturzebecher · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Robin Sturzebecher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-30 · TOC.Morgan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Jeske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-23 · TOC.Morgan · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marti Crane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · ACP.Watson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robin Sturzebecher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-16 · TOC.Morgan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Ruffieux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-15 · ACP.Watson · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Bricker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-26 · TOC.Morgan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Ruffieux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
69.6%
32W–14L · 56.8% of games
4.5
35.5%
22W–40L · 45.4% of games
7.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 65.3% of games
8.5
39.3%
35W–54L · 46.5% of games
9.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
75 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams