← Search

Chris Henrion

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
177 matches · 106W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chris Henrion to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history177 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Da.McNeill55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Larry Essary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-19 · La.Leins40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David McNeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · Da.McNeill55C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Larry Essary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-05 · La.Leins40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Larry Leins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · As.Burch18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Burch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · As.Burch18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Levine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · As.Burch18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Burch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-18 · Ri.Lowe40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-11 · Ri.Lowe40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Lowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · Ri.Lowe40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian McLean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-27 · Ri.Lowe40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cameron Burch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-23 · Ri.Lowe40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60.4%
58W–38L · 54.5% of games
7.5
51.4%
19W–18L · 48.5% of games
3.5mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
35 matches
#1 Singles
15%
26 matches
#2 Singles
15%
26 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova