← Search

Jakob Lagerstedt

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 72W–18L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jakob Lagerstedt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Ma.Durbin40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brendan OConnor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-24 · Ma.Durbin40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jonathan Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-05 · Ma.Roschel40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gary Fye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Ga.Fye18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vladic Khodush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · La.Fye18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Skvarcius mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
JONATHAN BALKCUM / Travis Dant
2026-06-19 · #4 Doubles · with Ben Rost championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Phillip Early / Kenneth Moore
2026-06-18 · #4 Doubles · with Nishant Mohan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-14 · La.Fye18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Skvarcius mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
Lee Larcade / Jake Jones
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · with Brian Satola championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-12 · #2 Doubles · with Chris Wandor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · with Chris Wandor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-04 · Ga.Fye40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britton Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 61.8% of games
3.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 58.2% of games
5.5
100%
7W–0L · 75.7% of games
6.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 65.5% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60.4% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert