← Search

Sandy Wood

— year-end
123 matches · 68W–55L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sandy Wood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Sa.Wood40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Culbreth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-24 · Ch.Higgins40C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hallie Shinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Lisa Scott / Amy Wolfe
2026-05-05 · Sa.Wood40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chunhui Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-07 · Sa.Wood40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Cagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Nicole Peterson / Keshia Green
2026-04-05 · Sa.Wood18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Cagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Lisa Scott / Valerie Szwarc
2026-03-24 · Sa.Wood40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · Sa.Wood18A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruthann Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-03-17 · Sa.Wood40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amelia Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-15 · Sa.Wood18A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-10 · Sa.Wood40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amelia Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-09 · Sa.Wood18A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amelia Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-03 · Sa.Wood40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amelia Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
64.3%
45W–25L · 54.6% of games
7.5
42.4%
14W–19L · 49.2% of games
8.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova