Melinda Neely
131 matches · 52W–79L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Melinda Neely to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history131 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 38.8% of games
4.0
52%
26W–24L · 51.4% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 28.6% of games
8.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 47.4% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.8% of games
7.5mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
6W–21L · 38.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
37 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.