← Search

Michelle Deng

— year-end
75 matches · 31W–44L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Michelle Deng to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lore Mandrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-04 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dana Latreille
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · Blevins/Thomas/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacy Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Zhang/Immordino/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xianghu Qu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · Zhang/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Welch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · Craft/Wade/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerri Frye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-21 · Zhang/Immordino/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Girish Hiremath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-15 · Craft/Wade/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Goode
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Eric Howser / Renee Adams
2026-06-06 · Zhang/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerry Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-03-29 · Webb/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Gooden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-22 · Aguzzi/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lily Qu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-21 · Mouser/Givens/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janelle VanHootegem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Teams44 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 87.3% of games
3.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 50.3% of games
3.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 48.9% of games
4.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 32.5% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 51.5% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 32.8% of games
3.5mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer