← Search

Natalie Sanso

Morrison, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 57W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Natalie Sanso to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
L
2026-08-13 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Perales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mai Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mai Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mai Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
Lori Loeb / Laura Powers
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Karen Boisnard championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Kathleen Sumpter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mai Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mai Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · MC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Bautista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Demers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-03 · MC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mai Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · MC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mai Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
47.7%
51W–56L · 49.4% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 51% of the time
#2 Doubles
51%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert