← Search

Karen Boisnard

Lakewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 85W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Boisnard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
L
2026-08-27 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gemma Koehler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-20 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Catalano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-06 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bobbi Dorgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gemma Koehler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Perales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Ana Bland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
Lori Loeb / Laura Powers
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Natalie Sanso championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Ana Bland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Catalano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Demers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roberta Barolat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · MC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ana Bland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
93.8%
15W–1L · 74% of games
3.5
50%
41W–41L · 50.9% of games
7.0
60%
9W–6L · 51.8% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 59.5% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 44.3% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
43 matches
#1 Singles
14%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
20 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal