Iona Pavlik
Omaha, NE
90 matches · 35W–55L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Iona Pavlik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history90 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Karen Jennings / Lisa Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 43.3% of games
4.0
43.1%
22W–29L · 47.8% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 44% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.