← Search

Karen Jennings

— year-end
77 matches · 31W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Jennings to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Jorgensen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Wiegand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · Jennings · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · Strawhecker · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Polly ReQua
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · Strawhecker · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Polly ReQua
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-19 · Strawhecker · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · Jennings · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Peoples
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · Jennings · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Peoples
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-02 · Jennings · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jo Lehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · Strawhecker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Polly ReQua
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-26 · Jennings · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacquie Dierks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · Jennings · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Polly ReQua
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Strawhecker · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 46.9% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
41.2%
21W–30L · 48.3% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 29% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 53.5% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams