← Search

Beth Stiles

Elkhorn, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 80W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Stiles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Jorgensen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Waldrop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · Jorgensen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tory Jorgensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Jennings · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kay Merkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Jennings · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kay Merkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · Jennings · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kay Merkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Jennings · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kay Merkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Debra Adams / Lisa Thomas
2026-05-30 · NE/Winquest/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Irwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · Jennings · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-20 · NE/Winquest/65 and over 8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clara Hames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · NE/Winquest/65 and over 8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clara Hames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · Jennings · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Polly ReQua
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-07 · NE/Winquest/55&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kay Merkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 48.5% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
48.3%
43W–46L · 49.4% of games
8.0
73.9%
34W–12L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe