← Search

Jessica Shefsky

Omaha, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 40W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jessica Shefsky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-06-30 · Hazelrigg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Hazelrigg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · Hazelrigg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Studts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-09 · Hazelrigg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Churchill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Jo Lehan / Tory Jorgensen
2026-05-26 · Hazelrigg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasey Hesse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · Hazelrigg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clara Hames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-05 · Hazelrigg · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · Hazelrigg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelly Grote
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Lisa Thomas
2026-01-25 · Hazelrigg · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-09-03 · Hazelrigg · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Grote
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-27 · Hazelrigg · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Hazelrigg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-07-01 · Hazelrigg · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-24 · Hazelrigg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 37.5% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
64.3%
36W–20L · 55.2% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 47.4% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#1 Singles
19%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal