← Search

Paul Lorring

Poulsbo, WA
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
92 matches · 59W–33L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Paul Lorring to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-02 · HBSQ-Adee · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yun Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-02 · NWW-HBSQ-Coghlan · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Charlston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-08 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Duane Hauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-11-01 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Charlston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-10-05 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenny Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-04 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Vana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-09-21 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Charlston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · with Mick Horton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-12 · #2 Doubles · with Mick Horton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-09-06 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Charlston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-05 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenny Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Katherine Crews championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 58% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.5% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
80.6%
25W–6L · 61.1% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 59.1% of games
8.0
55%
11W–9L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal