← Search

Thomas Brockelman

— year-end
64 matches · 19W–45L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Thomas Brockelman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2023-04-30 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andra Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2023-04-12 · #2 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with William Shampine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2023-03-29 · #2 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with William Shampine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2023-03-08 · #2 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Andrew Wallenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-03-01 · #2 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Jesse Daino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2022-11-02 · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with William Shampine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-08-20 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Campagna mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2022-06-25 · SYR: SFTC - Wallenstein · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael DeLaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2022-06-23 · Sedgwick Clays · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Don Cortez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2022-06-16 · Sedgwick Clays · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Barry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2022-05-26 · Sedgwick Clays · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Wilkens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2022-05-14 · SYR: SFTC - Wallenstein · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wei Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
20%
1W–4L · 44.8% of games
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.8% of games
4.0
20%
3W–12L · 36.8% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
30%
6W–14L · 42.6% of games
7.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#2 Male Doubles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova