← Search

Autumn Rich

Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 33W–65L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Autumn Rich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Davis/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carol Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-24 · Davis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · Bann/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Body
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · Davis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nelli Golmeeva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · Poulelis- NC- Southaven · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shelby Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · Bann/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathlene Poulelis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · Davis/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debi Bird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Shanna Eason / Stephen Lewis
2026-08-01 · Pelt/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cory Heinkel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-23 · Poulelis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vonya Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · Poulelis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grace Bann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · Poulelis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grace Bann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-10 · Pelt/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cory Heinkel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
48.8%
20W–21L · 48% of games
4.0
21.7%
5W–18L · 36.9% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
30%
3W–7L · 44% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.1% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
30 matches
#1 Singles
22%
22 matches
#2 Singles
18%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe