← Search

Shanna Eason

— year-end
111 matches · 86W–25L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Shanna Eason to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Eason/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Dent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-03 · White/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · White/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-27 · White/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · Eason/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Bricken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · Eason/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Kilroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Meg Smith / Terri Smith
2026-08-18 · Eason/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Barrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Taylor Bender / Lori Jones
2026-08-13 · White/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-11 · Eason/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Bricken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-01 · Alexander/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-30 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Mihalko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · Musick/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia House
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Teams50 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 65.4% of games
3.5
80%
44W–11L · 59.4% of games
4.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.3% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 55.6% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 59.3% of games
4.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King