← Search

Naomi Jennings

— year-end
44 matches · 24W–20L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Naomi Jennings to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-07-09 · Boykin-CCC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blair Campbell Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · Boykin-CCC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Diane Chenault
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-29 · Boykin-CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Suzette Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-16 · Boykin-CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Crow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-14 · Morgan-CCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Megan Belenchia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-08-05 · Taylor-CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emmy Millwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-07-27 · Taylor-CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-17 · Taylor-CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-13 · Boykin-Cleveland Country Club · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Belenchia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-06-09 · Taylor/Jennings-CCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trent Jennings mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-29 · Boykin-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-03-30 · Boykin-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.6% of games
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.5% of games
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.9% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 41.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert