← Search

Russell Young

— year-end
43 matches · 19W–24L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Russell Young to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Walters, Eric · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chad Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-17 · Walters, Eric · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jerry Sloan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-10 · Walters, Eric · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jerry Sloan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
Seth Thompson / Kurt Black
2026-07-27 · Walters, Eric · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Randy Lominick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · Sahoo, Jitendra · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · Sahoo, Jitendra · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Tuggle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
Michael Thomas / Johnell Mcintosh
2026-05-07 · Sahoo, Jitendra · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitch Stentiford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-23 · Sahoo, Jitendra · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Moseley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-16 · Sahoo, Jitendra · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Germany
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-09 · Sahoo, Jitendra · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Germany
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-26 · Sahoo, Jitendra · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-19 · Sahoo, Jitendra · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stanley Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 54.5% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
51.7%
15W–14L · 52.1% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 44.8% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer