← Search

Lesley Tompkins

— year-end
146 matches · 74W–72L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lesley Tompkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history146 matches
W
2026-06-02 · Baker 18+ 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Sibol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-19 · Baker 18+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regina Roesner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · Baker 18+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Steffen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · Baker 18+ 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Steffen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
Jennifer Lee / Dian Zhang
2026-04-20 · Baker 18+ 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Danielle Barry / Nina Cerasoli
2024-11-19 · Goss · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carolyn Wescott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-15 · Goss · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carolyn Wescott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Danielle Barry / Nina Cerasoli
2024-11-07 · Goss · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Piazza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Sydney James / Diane Carson
2024-11-01 · Goss · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gina Mannion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Kim Daniels / Eileen Dietz
2024-10-06 · Lee-Der of the Pack · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ruzica Ragontse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-09-16 · Lee-Der of the Pack · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ruzica Ragontse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Stacey Lyons / Anna Williams
2024-09-10 · Lee-Der of the Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beyza Akcam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
50%
37W–37L · 48.4% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.9% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.7% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.2% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
62.5%
15W–9L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
36 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe