← Search

Barbara Richmond

— year-end
17 matches · 1W–16L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Barbara Richmond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2021-05-19 · Anton · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Baggett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2021-05-13 · Anton · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Anton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-05-05 · Anton · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Baggett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Tammy Holman / Deborah Holeman
2019-12-02 · Crittenden/Wood (FD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Spesia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2019-11-20 · Crittenden/Wood (FD) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Weldon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2019-11-04 · Crittenden/Wood (FD) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Anton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Amy Fikes / Nikol Kokaz
2019-10-28 · Crittenden/Wood (FD) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Spesia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2019-10-07 · Crittenden/Wood (FD) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadia Sirajuddin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2019-09-30 · Crittenden/Wood (FD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle McAllister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2019-09-16 · Crittenden/Wood (FD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Anton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2019-08-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Mary Elliott / Ellen Uhlemeyer
2019-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Teams2 teams · 2020–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
7.1%
1W–13L · 34.5% of games
6.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 71% of the time
#3 Doubles
71%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer