← Search

Antoinette Kovar

Saint Louis, MO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 80W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Antoinette Kovar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
Julia Bush / Bryan Sutter
2026-08-09 · Partner in Crime (Oba) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Philip Kammann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · Partner in Crime (Oba) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Wesley Law mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-12 · Partner in Crime (Oba) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Philip Kammann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Bush/Pupillo · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liz Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-26 · Bush/Pupillo · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dana Metzger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · Bush/Pupillo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Pupillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Lahm · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dana Metzger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-3
L
2026-05-02 · Lahm · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vikki Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · Lahm · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leanne Cantu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-18 · Lahm · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dana Metzger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-11 · Lahm · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vikki Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-27 · Lahm · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dana Metzger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 51.8% of games
4.5
54.3%
51W–43L · 52.8% of games
9.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 51.4% of games
9.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe