← Search

Tracey K Trembath

— year-end
98 matches · 66W–32L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Tracey K Trembath to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Basham-Simpson (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Runge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Mindy Haas / Brittany Mohrman
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Therese Basham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Jennie Henry / Lindsay Chase
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Therese Basham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-20 · #2 Doubles · with Therese Basham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Lori Brewer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · Basham/Trembath · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abbie Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · Basham/Trembath · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Therese Basham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Basham/Trembath · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Brinkman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Basham/Trembath · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Therese Basham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · with Therese Basham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Meg Gregory / Nikki Nadreau
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · with Sara Runge championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
Ellie Huff / Erica Peterson
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Sara Runge championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
69.6%
48W–21L · 55.7% of games
5.0
25%
1W–3L · 47.2% of games
9.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 60.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
29 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer