← Search

Sadie Simpson

IDAHO FALLS, ID
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 40W–35L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Sadie Simpson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
L
2026-06-25 · Thompreemann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-17 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shellie Willardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-24 · Thompson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jordan Simpson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-15 · Thompson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jordan Simpson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-08 · Thompson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jordan Simpson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2024-06-17 · Kunz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kira Adolpho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-06-13 · Kunz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-22 · Kunz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kira Adolpho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-20 · Kunz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsie Boyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-05-17 · Kunz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.6% of games
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.7% of games
4.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.8% of games
7.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 36.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert