← Search

Brandon Longenecker

Mount Joy, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 13W–8L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brandon Longenecker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
W
2026-06-06 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-27 · Hempfield - Arters · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Kurtz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-01 · Hempfield NO MERCY - Banh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Madonna Hufnagel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-27 · Hempfield NO MERCY - Banh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Casey Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
Izabela Nitecki / Chris Shaw
2026-01-23 · Hempfield NO MERCY - Banh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Annie Rakos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · Hempfield NO MERCY - Banh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Caitlin Barcheski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-01 · Hempfield - Baumer Tri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Kirchner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-10-11 · Hempfield - Baumer Tri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregg Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-13 · Hempfield - Baumer Tri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Benjamin Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2025-07-15 · Hempfield - Roeder Davis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 55.3% of games
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
11 matches
#1 Singles
24%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#2 Singles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova